Saturday, April 08, 2006

REAL IMMIGRATION REFORM

That’s what I’d call the proposal in Charles Krauthammer’s latest Washington Post column, titled “First a Wall, Then Amnesty.” Let’s look at Charles’ proposal:

Every sensible immigration policy has two objectives: (1) to regain control of our borders so that it is we who decide who enters and (2) to find a way to normalize and legalize the situation of the 11 million illegals among us. Start with the second. No one of good will wants to see these 11 million suffer. But the obvious problem is that legalization creates an enormous incentive for new illegals to come.

I still haven’t heard from McCain’s gang how their legislation seals off the borders. That’s because it isn’t serious about that aspect. On the other hand, I still haven’t heard how the Sensenbrenner legislation addresses the illegal aliens already here. That’s because they aren’t interested in realistic solutions to that problem.

The real solution to the immigration problem is Sensenbrenner’s shutting off the flow of illegals into the U.S. before offering amnesty to the illegals already here.

Forget employer sanctions. Build a barrier. It is simply ridiculous to say it cannot be done. If one fence won’t do it, then build a second 100 yards behind it. And then build a road for patrols in between. Put in cameras. Put in sensors. Put out lots of patrols. Can’t be done? Israel’s border fence has been extraordinarily successful in keeping out potential infiltrators who are far more determined than mere immigrants. Nor have very many North Koreans crossed into South Korea in the past 50 years.

The Israeli wall is a perfect example of how a country unilaterally protects itself from a lawless nation. Would building a fence strain U.S.-Mexican relations? Most likely. Do I care? Not a bit. National security comes first in a post-9/11 world. All other considerations come in a distant third at best.

This is no time for mushy compromise. A solution requires two acts of national will: the ugly act of putting up a fence and the supremely generous act of absorbing as ultimately full citizens those who broke our laws to come to America. This is not a compromise meant to appease both sides without achieving anything. It is not some piece of hybrid legislation that arbitrarily divides illegals into those with five-year-old “roots” in America and those without, or some such mischief-making nonsense.

Get these competing pieces of legislation to conference, implement the wall first, then start on the legalization track. It’s America’s best hope.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Cross-post at LetFreedomRingBlog

THE GALVIN OPINION linked with ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION: A BETTER PLAN THE GALVIN PLAN

Friday, April 07, 2006

SOUTHPARK AND CARTOON JIHAD

southpark.jpg

Longtime readers know I'm not a fan of South Park. But the e-mails I've been getting all day from South Park viewers about last night's episode just might change my mind.

The Political Pit Bull has posted a video clip from the show.

John Noonan at The Officer's Club watched it and blogged a comprehensive summary--so good I'm quoting at length:

The show's plot centered around the Mohammed cartoon controversy, opening with a scene where main character Stan is startled out of bed by his hysterical father, who rushes the family out of the house to join the shrieking masses already frantically seeking shelter.

The reason for their panic? In the South Park episode, Fox's animated sitcom The Family Guy is planning to air an episode where the Prophet Mohammed makes a cameo appearance. Family Guy is an animated sitcom, meaning a Prophet appearance would be -gasp! You guessed it- a Mohammed cartoon.

The townsfolk of South Park barricade themselves into the village community center, fearing an American repeat of the violent Muslim response to the Danish cartoons. Only after a news report airs the following morning that Fox made a last minute decision to censor Mohammed do they emerge from their makeshift fortifications.

I'll skip to the end of the episode, as the middle was filled with subplots. This is where it gets a little complicated.

Fox announces that the Family Guy episode was a two-part series, and that Mohammed would appear uncensored the following week. The South Park show ends on a cliffhanger, as the people of America begin burying their heads in the sand to prove their sensitivity to Muslims (they won't hear the show or see the show with their heads buried, get it?), while a voiceover announces that South Park is also a two-part series, and begins asking that Adam West-Batman style of questioning: "Will the people of America be safe? Will Fox let the Family Guy air? Will they show Mohammed Uncensored? Find out next week to see if Comedy Central pusses out."

I told you that story so I could write the following.

South Park used the Family Guy as a metaphor for their own show. Trey Parker and Matt Stone announced to the world that they will caticature Mohammed next week, and dared Comedy Central to stop them.

South Park may be an odd place to find inspirational speeches, but one came from a SP citizen responding to a professor's call to submit to the Islamist temper tantrums:

Freedom of speech is at stake here, don't you all see? If anything, we should all make cartoons of Mohammed and show the terrorists and the extremists that we are all united in the belief that every person has a right to say what they want. Look people, it's been really easy for us to stand up for free speech lately. For the past few decades, we haven't had to risk anything to defend it. One of those times is right now. And if we aren't willing to risk what we have now, then we just believe in free speech, but won't defend it.

Wow.

More blogging about the show from:

Newsbusters

Captain's Quarters (named Blogger of the Year by The Week magazine - congrats, Ed!!!)

Brendan Loy (fellow Blogger of the Year nominee - congrats, Brendan!)

And The Anchoress, who writes:

Tonight’s episode was brilliant. And brave. Basically Matt Stone and Trey Parker took all of their creative capital and threw down a gauntlet: America, will you submit to Dhimmitude (beginning with the continual placing of your head in the sand) or will you stand up for free speech and liberty.

It’s about the Mohammed Cartoons. It’s about more than that, though. Much more. Part II is next week. If you can see Part I before then, try to…it is a scathing critique of America and Americans and their willingness to weaken themselves through fear and misplaced sensitivity.

The show will rerun April 6th at 10pm. Part II is set for next Wednesday at 10pm.

I will be watching.

***

Reader Vernon writes:

I know you['re] new to South Park, Mrs. Malkin, but I thought you should know that there has already been an episode of South Park with the prophet Muhammed in it.

It had him, Jesus, Buddha, Krsna, Lao Tzu, Joeseph Smith, and Moses all team
up to form a super squad of "Super Best Friends" to fight against the cult
following of David Blaine.

This episode premiered nearly five years ago and their was no big response
from insulted Muslims or anyone else (at least not on this scale). No one seems to have even mentioned this in light of the recent protests and violence of the Muhammed cartoons.

Comedy Central didn't seem to have a problem with it then and hopefully
won't cave into pulling it (like they did with repeats of the scientology
episode and the AA episode).

Blogger Pat at BelchSpeak:

There is a dual meaning to the South Park episode, including the Muhammad cartoon. Matt and Trey were already censored two weeks ago when Comedy Central pulled an episode that lampooned Scientology. Another character said in the show, "Dont you see? If they censor a show about islam, then next time the show has something about catholics, then the catholics will want the show pulled. And then the Jews. Eventually Family Guy will get pulled off the air completely." Yes, it was about the muslim cartoons. But it is also about how Tom Cruise and his scientologist stooges were able to use a FAKE kooky religion to pull a south park episode. And comedy central caved. I expect that Comedy Central will pull next week's episode too. Or, don't be surprised if there isn't a part two at all. South Park pulled a stunt in the past where they promised a part two to find out who Cartman's father really was, and they refused to show the second part for three weeks.

Thursday, April 06, 2006

YEAH, RIGHT!

MCKINNEY: "I APOLOGIZE"

***update: video of McKinney's bodyguard threatening a reporter (hat tip: Peach Pundit)***

Expose the Left has the video.

mckinney002.jpg

A truly sorry sight.

***

Meanwhile, grand jury proceedings are underway and two witnesses will take the stand:

A grand jury has supoenaed two Capitol Hill aides who witnessed the March 29 confrontation between Rep. Cynthia McKinney, D-Ga.. and a Capitol Police officer. McKinney is accused of striking an officer after he tried to stop her from entering a House office building without going through a security checkpoint.

Lisa Subrize, executive assistant to Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, R-Mich., and Troy Phillips, senior legislative assistant to Rep. Sam Farr, D- Calif., notified Speaker Dennis Hastert late Wednesday, as is customary under House procedure.

"After consultation with the Office of General Counsel, I have determined that compliance with the subpoena is consistent with the precedents and privileges of the House," both aides said in statements that a clerk read into the House record. Bob Jackson, a spokesman for McCotter, said that Subrize witnessed the confrontation and immediately filled out a form for the Capitol Police, describing what she saw. He and a spokeswoman for Farr declined further comment.

More trouble via the AJC:

McKinney has been keeping a very high profile since the incident occurred, asserting in press conferences and television interviews that she was the victim of racial profiling. The officer who stopped McKinney, an African-American, was white.

McKinney made no reference to racial profiling in her statement on the House floor.

But even as McKinney appeared to be trying to put the issue to rest, a bodyguard she hired – reportedly a former Georgia state trooper – was raising another furor when he threatened a television reporter trying to interview McKinney outside the Capitol just minutes before she appeared on the House floor.

When the reporter from Cox Broadcasting tried to ask McKinney about the grand jury, the bodyguard told him, "I'm going to put your ass in jail. I'm a police officer," a videotape of the incident shows.

Asked if he worked for Capitol police, the man said, "I work for Miss McKinney."

Word that McKinney had hired a bodyguard roiled the ranks of the Capitol police who were worried that the guard was carrying a weapon. They said they are concerned about what the bodyguard might do if Capitol police challenged McKinney at a security checkpoint.

McKinney's office did not return repeated phone calls seeking comment.



Jim Hoft
is right on: "Is it any wonder that Republican Michael Steele is making inroads with black voters when Cynthia McKinney is a typical representative of the modern day black democrat?"

***

Previous:

The party of police-haters
The party of race-baiting victims
More trouble for McKinney
Crazy Cynthia's case goes to the feds
Same old, same old (video added)
What will she say now?
McKinney plays the race card

NASCAR SMACKS DOWN NBC

I spoke this afternoon with Ramsey Poston, managing director of corporate communications at NASCAR. He's on his way down to Texas for the NASCAR race this weekend, and he responded to NBC Dateline's undercover Muslim stings, which I first reported on yesterday morning.

"This is outrageous for a news organization with the reputation of NBC to stoop to the level of attempting to create news instead of reporting it. Any legitimate journalist should be ashamed."

Poston told me NASCAR contacted NBC, which confirmed they are doing the story (also reported here yesterday).

"It's hard to even call it journalism," Poston told me. I asked him why he thought NBC was targeting NASCAR fans for the racism sting. Poston vigorously defended the NASCAR fan base as "diverse, from every background in America."

Poston expressed dismay at NBC's "attempt to provoke a reaction from our fans" and said his organization was "confident they would not fall for it."

The mainstream media can't ignore NBC's news-staging anymore. The Associated Press follows the story here.

NASCAR said it was "outrageous" that "Dateline NBC" targeted one of its race tracks last weekend for a possible segment on anti-Muslim sentiment in the United States.

NASCAR said NBC confirmed it was sending Muslim-looking men to a race, along with a camera crew to film fans' reactions. The NBC crew was "apparently on site in Martinsville, Va., walked around and no one bothered them," NASCAR spokesman Ramsey Poston said Wednesday.

Lookee here: MSNBC is carrying the AP report.

***

Reader Woody B. was in Martinsville last weekend and e-mails:

I was at the race in Martinsville, VA on April 2. I noticed a Muslim man with two apparent Muslim women roaming the grounds before the race. He was wearing the traditional head wear and they wear dressed in traditional female Muslim garb. They never seemed to be going anywhere in particular. To the credit of Nascar fans, I never did see someone do so much as a double take at their presence. Please keep us informed.

Reader Jerry W. shares observations about why Dateline may think it will improve its chances of entrapment in Texas this weekend vs. the Martinsville track:

When you compare the two tracks, from Dateline's viewpoint, moving the filming to Texas makes sense. Martinsville is a older, much smaller track with a seating capacity of around 63,000 and no infield area for the fans. At most tracks where NASCAR races are held, the infield is used by RVs who park there for the weekend. The people who pay to stay there watch the race from the roof of their vehicle, but mostly party. Since most infield crowds are on the rowdy side, this would be a logical area for Dateline to film people's reaction to Arabic-looking fans. Since Martinsville doesn't offer this, all the filming would have to be in the stands where it's pretty much like any other major sporting event. The Texas track is much larger, with grandstand seating for over 140,000 and sufficient room in the infield for by the track's estimate 53,000 more people. The track promises to be, if not completely sold out by race day, at least extremely close to it. Much easier to find someone willing to react "suitably" for Dateline with that size crowd, plus the added "bonus" of finding such behavior in the President's home state.

Chris S. was also at the Martinsville race last weekend. He didn't see the ringers, but he did share this:

[M]y wife and I attended last weekend's NASCAR race in Martinsville, and had a wonderful time. But if NBC wants to guarantee they get a negative reaction to their "plant", all they need to do is put him in a Jeff Gordon t-shirt. The Dale Earnhardt, Jr. fans will be sure to give him a rough time! His fans are definitely the most vocal of them all.

Just received this e-mail from Daniell M.:

I am a BLACK MAN …who has been going to NASCAR for many many years. I was at the NASCAR Craftsman Truck race at Martinsville, VA. I had a great time like I have for many years. Tell NBC to blow it out their small empty brains.

Reader Steve B. proposes the best way to tick off NASCAR fans:

"Wear an NBC t-shirt."

***

Previous:

News sting ideas of the day
All the news that's fit to stage
NBC: Staging the news again?

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

SOUTH PARK TAKES ON SAN FRANCISCO

South Park Takes On San Francisco

South Park in SFA brilliant showcase of truth in humor.

Last year, it was big, bad Bill O’Reilly that hurt some feelings in the City of carefree liberalism. Now, South Park is dishing it out and some don’t like it.

S.F. Examiner reports: “A brown cloud hangs over San Francisco, but it’s not smog. It’s smug.”

Um. Actually. No. We won’t go there.

Fueled by the environmental correctness of The City’s hybrid-driving, progressive-leaning, holier-than-thou residents, the cloud grows into a “perfect storm” and wipes San Francisco — complete with its countless wine and cheese stores — off the map. In between, tie-dyed hippies wander Haight-Ashbury and children suck on tabs of acid like Jolly Ranchers.

Welcome to San Francisco as imagined by the third-grade minds of “South Park” creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone. The City took center stage in the hit animated series this week in a scathing, off-color send up of San Francisco’s notoriously liberal populace. In the end, Cartman, the show’s chunky, foul-mouthed kid, is forced to rescue his friend Kyle from San Francisco during the height of the smug storm. He dons a toxic suit to keep The City’s extreme liberalness from contaminating him.

“You don’t know San Francisco, Butters,” Cartman says to another of the show’s characters. “It was the breeding ground for the hippie movement in the ’60s. Those hard-core liberals, lesbian activists and diehard modern hippies young and old. I swore I would never set foot in San Francisco. God help me.”

Sounds like Cartman knows the place well.

The episode, which [was] reaired [last] weekend, begins in South Park with elementary school kids that are the stars of the show. Kyle’s father has purchased a hybrid car, but decides to leave the town after he is ridiculed for his environmental activism. Kyle and his family move to San Francisco, where they learn that people are very impressed with themselves for their enlightened views on the environment and other politically correct causes, unlike rubes from the Midwest and elsewhere.
. . .

Supervisor Tom Ammiano said it just comes with the territory of being San Francisco. “It’s kind of a national pastime to make fun of San Francisco. I think it’s jealousy to a large part,” said Ammiano. He then quickly added, “Oh, does that sound smug?”

No. It sounds out-of-touch with reality. Bingo.

Welcome to San Francisco, indeed.

RELATED:
See the South Park video.

88 GOES LONG

In the Game for Pennsylvania Governor, NFL Hall of Famer Lynn Swann Is Running Like a Pro

By Mark Leibovich

MANHEIM, Pa.

Novice politicians need to pass a few basic tests. First is the ability to work a room, dominate it, if possible -- or, at the very least, convey a sense that you relish being there, meeting everyone and hearing the stories about how this guy met you at a banquet in Pittsburgh 20 years ago and you were nice enough to sign an autograph that he still has, by the way, in a scrapbook somewhere . . .

Lynn Swann aces this test with an ease and grace that befit his status both as a Hall of Fame wide receiver for the Pittsburgh Steelers and as a dancer who began studying ballet when he was 8.

Swann, 54, doesn't so much work a room as prance through it: His double-pump handshakes are brisk and authoritative, his grin and eye contact unrelenting. He stutter-steps in and out of conversations in 15 seconds or less, but never seems in a rush. Swann has mastered the art of Being a Famous Guy -- performing on the Famous Guy circuit of sporting events, speaking appearances and autograph scrums.

"Smile," says the man snapping a photo of Swann, who is, of course, already smiling. The Republican candidate for governor of Pennsylvania is working his way through a wine-and-hors d'oeuvres reception hosted by a chapter of the Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC), a trade group whose membership veers Republican. As for football loyalties, this south-central region of Pennsylvania is a battleground between Steelers and Philadelphia Eagles allegiances.

But, in this office park -- on this evening, in the presence of No. 88 -- the room is trending heavily Black and Gold. "I'm a lifelong Steeler guy," proclaims one, introducing himself to Swann, who spins into his celebrity meet-and-greet routine: signing the man's football, then a cocktail napkin, then posing for a cellphone photo.

He completes the set by signing another man's "Swann for Governor" lapel sticker, the likes of which are now selling for a buck on eBay.

Recurring Doubts

Another essential test for a first-time candidate is whether he has a compelling personal story, ideally of the Horatio Alger, up-from-nothing variety. Swann nails this one, too, although whether his superstar narrative qualifies him to lead a state of 12.5 million people is another matter.

The youngest of three boys, Swann was born in a small Tennessee town, the son of a dentist's assistant (mother) and a janitor (father). He attended the University of Southern California on a football scholarship, was an All-American, played eight years in the NFL with four Super Bowl victories, and is recalled as perhaps the most acrobatic receiver in league history. Announcer Curt Gowdy dubbed him "the Baryshnikov of football."

Swann retired from the NFL in 1982, worked hundreds of ABC college football broadcasts as a sideline reporter, hosted "Battle of the Network Stars" and "To Tell the Truth," played himself in "The Waterboy" with Adam Sandler and "The Last Boy Scout" with Bruce Willis, raised money for the Pittsburgh Ballet and chaired President Bush's Council on Physical Fitness. Now, Swann, who has never run for office before, wants to be the first black governor of Pennsylvania.

"My parents never thought their youngest son would be standing here accepting the nomination for governor," Swann said tearfully on the night in February when he was ensured the state GOP's nomination for governor (Swann has no opposition in a May primary). "We truly do live in the greatest nation of the world."

Still, as Swann traverses the nation's sixth most populous state he is trailed by recurring doubts about whether he's fit to tackle the job. Questions, in other words, about what Swann has ever run before. Besides post patterns.

"Probably Big Brothers, Big Sisters of America, when I was national board chair for two years," Swann says. (Pressed on this, Swann allows that the position was a part-time volunteer appointment that entailed no day-to-day management responsibilities.)

Swann is much more tentative in interviews than he is in a crowd. Since announcing his candidacy in January and winning the endorsement of the Republican state committee in February -- this was after his two GOP opponents withdrew -- Swann has largely avoided reporters. The Swann campaign granted The Washington Post 20 minutes with him before the reception in Manheim.

He sits in a conference room, his long fingers behind his head, a posture of relaxation. But many of Swann's responses come out clipped and abrupt. This is especially so on the matter of why he's running for governor, as opposed to a non-executive office, such as Congress. That has been the preferred route of other former sports heroes, such as NFL great Steve Largent (a former GOP congressman from Oklahoma); Hall of Fame pitcher Jim Bunning (a Republican senator from Kentucky); and NBA great Bill Bradley (a former Democratic U.S. senator from New Jersey).

Swann resists such comparisons as too narrowly focused on former athletes. There have been other celebrities who have been elected governors, he says. Swann and his supporters frequently mention Ronald Reagan and, occasionally, Arnold Schwarzenegger, although never Jesse Ventura, the former governor of Minnesota.

"Did George W. Bush have a payroll to meet prior to running for governor of Texas?" Swann asks. When a reporter mentions the president's stint as owner of the Texas Rangers, Swann protests that Bush wasn't the team's day-to-day manager. (Bush also ran an oil business.)

Either way, Swann has a larger point to make: "There are lots of people who come to politics from varied backgrounds who have done well," he says. "If you go back to the Founding Fathers, I don't think that they intended for everyone to be a professional politician."

"Professional politician" is a favorite phrase among Swann and his supporters. As in, Swann is not one. And his opponent, Democrat Edward G. Rendell, a former mayor of Philadelphia who is completing his first term as governor, is one. Like many other candidates who have limited political experience, Swann fashions himself as "just a citizen," an "outsider," a fresh (albeit famous) face seeking to dislodge an entrenched figure.

"He's just a private citizen and non-politician who has taken a look at what's happening in Harrisburg and said, 'You know what, I can do better,' " says Jack Zimmer, the president of the local ABC chapter who introduced Swann in Manheim. "Yes, we've seen Number 88 make great catches, but more importantly, we feel like we're like him. He's like us."

Swann emphasizes this point in his brief stump speech. That he is an everyday Pennsylvanian -- an Average Lynn with a wife, two kids, a house in the Pittsburgh suburbs. His remarks also include a call for lower taxes, less government regulation and a repeated homage to "common-sense solutions."

"I believe we can do better than we have," Swann says. "I believe in the state of Pennsylvania. I believe in the work ethic, I believe in the people. I think we just need to sit down and do some common-sense things for the commonwealth. This is not rocket science."

It's no stroll on the Astroturf, either. "I have to question whether he understands the magnitude and depth of the job," says Dwight White, a teammate of Swann's on the four Steelers Super Bowl teams. White also remained in Pittsburgh and has gone on to a successful career at a financial services firm. White, who says he and Swann are at "different ends of the political spectrum," is undecided about whether he'll support his former teammate.

He jokingly compares the notion of Swann in the governor's office to a TV ad for Holiday Inn Express in which someone asks a man who is attempting to perform surgery if he has ever done this before. No, the man says. But at least the "surgeon" was smart enough to stay at a Holiday Inn Express the night before.

"People tend to hold people to much higher standards if they are running for president or governor," says G. Terry Madonna, a director of the Center for Politics and Public Affairs at Franklin and Marshall College in Lancaster. "If someone gets elected to Congress, and he turns out to be a whack job, so what? There's 435 people there."

As Swann concludes his speech in Manheim, Zimmer breaks in and leads the 100 or so people in the room in a surprise rendition of "Happy Birthday to You" for Swann, who turned 54 a few days earlier.

" Happy birthdayyyy, Mr. Governor ," Zimmer croons, pressing his mouth against the microphone in something of a low-rent version of Marilyn Monroe singing "Happy Birthday" to President Kennedy.

Spotty Voting Record

One of the harsher tests for a first-time candidate is parrying questions from the media. Swann has had a relatively easy go of it so far. But he is clearly on uncertain footing when facing scrutiny.

This was apparent during a February interview on ABC's "This Week," in which he demonstrated, at best, a shaky grasp of some issues he might face as governor. He conveyed, at one point, the impression that he thought abortion would become automatically illegal if the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade .

When host George Stephanopoulos asked Swann whether he would try to pass a law banning abortion if Roe v. Wade were struck down, he replied, "Well, if the Supreme Court overturned it, then they've basically overturned it. They've basically said that, you know, you can't have an abortion."

Stephanopoulos corrected Swann, saying it would be up to each state to decide its own abortion laws.

"Well," Swann said, "if they send it to the states to decide, as opposed to making a decision that abortions are illegal, then I would sign legislature [sic] making abortions illegal."

A few days after the Stephanopoulos interview, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported that Swann had not voted in 20 of 36 state elections over the past 18 years. Reporters pelted Swann with questions about his voting history at a campaign stop near Philadelphia, and he ended the news conference abruptly.

Although some prominent Pennsylvania Republicans privately say they found the Stephanopoulos interview troubling, supporters of Swann ascribe this early turbulence to inexperience. They say the candidate will improve with time. "Lynn needs to be prepared to engage Rendell on the issues at a certain point," says Republican lobbyist Bob Walker, a former Pennsylvania congressman and early Swann supporter. Walker says he is confident Swann will get there.

Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman answers a question about the interview by dismissing it. "I'm not sure Pennsylvanians are paying attention to Stephanopoulos interviews," Mehlman says. "They're paying closer attention to their high property taxes."

Swann says he was "disappointed" by the interview, but not by his own performance. Rather, he says he was disappointed "that George had so much of his own agenda on the table," which he characterizes as "trying to prove himself a better journalist, or trying to put someone on the spot."

Was Stephanopoulos's Roe. v. Wade question valid?

"Yeah, but see, you know, if I face it, I face it, okay? There are other issues in Pennsylvania that are right here on the table, plain and simple."

After about 20 minutes, Melissa Walters, Swann's press secretary, interjects that the interview is almost over.

Was Swann surprised by the controversy over his voting record?

He laughs. "I expected people to have more common sense," he says. "People" being the people in the media. "I guess common sense doesn't always prevail," he says. "You're not going to let common sense get in the way of a good headline."

The headline is that Swann has a spotty voting record, and several news accounts juxtaposed that record with a quote from Swann in the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel in October 2004: "I have always been someone to believe that when you have certain freedoms, you should exercise them and not take it for granted. If you don't take part in the process, and you don't vote, then I am not willing to listen to your complaints."

Swann, who does not dispute the quote, is more defiant than sheepish on the subject of his voting record.

"Who has a perfect record, okay?" he says. "How about some basic common sense?" He shakes his head.

"Say you're away," Swann continues, referring to a hypothetical Election Day. "You think you're going to get back. But the plane doesn't take off.

"How about you think you're going to vote after work. And so you head out for the day. But something happens. Traffic jam. Car accident. You don't get there. You don't vote."

Hailing a Hero

Perhaps the most important early test for a candidate is whether he is serious about winning. This is the first thing Swann addresses, and without prompting. With every person and group he meets, Swann says, "I want them to understand that I'm in this to win. People need to understand that. I'm not out there to put a good face for the Republican Party."

The subtext is unmistakable: Most Republican candidates don't have faces like Swann's.

Indeed, Swann's race is something of an X-factor against Rendell, who, like many other Democrats, has received overwhelming support from African Americans when he runs against Republicans. Roughly 85 percent of black voters supported Rendell in 2002, and political analysts posit that if Swann can shrink that margin by 10 percent, it could turn a close election in Swann's favor. Rendell holds a slight lead -- 3 percent or 4 percent -- in early polls.

Some commentators and Rendell supporters charge that the Republican National Committee is using Swann to further Mehlman's aim of bolstering the party's minority ranks. They point to Swann's thin voting history -- even in Republican primaries -- as proof of his Johnny-come-lately commitment to the GOP.

Mehlman says that Swann's candidacy stems not from any elaborate recruiting effort on the GOP's part, but rather Swann's own desire to get involved. "This was Pennsylvania-grown," Mehlman says of Swann's candidacy. "Not Washington-grown."

Another wild card is the popularity of the Steelers in western Pennsylvania after the team's first Super Bowl win since Swann's playing days.

"To me, Swann's not black, he's black and gold," says Larry Ceisler, a Democratic consultant in Philadelphia who is a Steeler fan and originally from Pittsburgh. "You have to be from there to fully appreciate the pull of that team," he says, referring to the Super Bowl teams of Swann's era.

Swann runs a careful cross pattern between leveraging his football popularity for political gain and not overdoing it. "I'll take whatever help I can get," Swann says.

After the reception, Swann beelines for the men's room, emerges after 90 seconds and is met immediately in the hallway by a man waiting with another football for No. 88 to autograph.

Someone follows with a small piece of paper. And another with a campaign sticker. And a woman clutching a Terrible Towel.

"Thanks, governor," a man calls after Swann, who is now doing a down-and-out pattern to a back exit. He signs three more autographs in the parking lot and receives a compliment on his speech.

"Slam-dunk, governor," the fan says, before adjusting his metaphor to the gridiron. "I mean, touchdown, governor."