Thursday, April 12, 2007

BLOOD IN THE WATER

Liberals see this whole Imus situation as a way to rid themselves of the problem of talk radio. Now that they've succeeded in getting MSNBC to pull Imus' program, they'll concentrate on CBS .. trying to get the radio show cancelled. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if they succeed. Then they will turn their attention to the rest of us. The tape recorders will be running. There is not one single significant right-of-center radio talk show out there that is not going to come under fire. Liberals know -- they've proven it to themselves -- that they simply cannot succeed in talk radio. So, it's all very simple. If they can't succeed, destroy the genre. Their original plan was to wait until Democrats control the congress and the White House and then murder talk radio with the so-called "Fairness Doctrine." Now that they're on the verge of having a talk radio scalp on their belts as retribution for a bad and mean-spirited joke, they see that they may not have to wait for the electorate to give them the power.

In the meantime... while the race industry is calling for the head of Don Imus, we have Crystal Gail Mangum of North Carolina. Who is she? She is the woman who falsely accused three members of the Duke lacrosse team of rape. Her unsubstantiated charges resulted in a media firestorm against Duke University and these lacrosse players.

Would you like to spend a few moments comparing the effect of Mangum's charges on the Duke lacrosse team and Imus' words on the Rutgers woman's basketball team? Sure! Why not! Now, let's see ...... The remainder of the Duke lacrosse season was cancelled. They were nationally ranked, and had to forfeit the rest of their games. The coach, Mike Pressler, resigned. "Mug shots" of the lacrosse players were posted on campus. Mark Anthony Neal, an African Studies professor on the campus said that this was "a case of racialized sexual violence." A Durham, N.C. resident called it "racial terrorism." In the middle of all of this we had a district attorney, Michael Nifong, who was running for reelection in a majority-black jurisdiction. There were suggestions that he wanted to be the mayor one day.

Jesse Jackson had plenty to say about this case also. In his column on Blacknews.com Jackson said "Predictably, the right-wing media machine has kicked in, prompting mean-spirited attacks upon the accuser's character." Later he offered to pay Mangum's tuition for a college education if her story proved true. Later he amended his promise. In January he said that the Rainbow/Push Coalition would pay her college tuition even if it turns out she completely fabricated her story! Now isn't that special? Hey sisters! How would you like to get a college scholarship from Jesse Jackson? Apparently all you have to do is lodge a false rape accusation against an all-white college sports team!

Get out your checkbook, Jesse. Now we have learned that it was a hoax. No truth. The North Carolina Attorney General's office has declared the accused players to be innocent. A State Bar investigation of Nifong continues. And thus far Jesse Jackson has not come forward to offer any comfort to the lacrosse players falsely accused by Ms. Mangum.

Now ... why even bring all of this up? Well, we have two college teams in the mix. A Rutgers women's basketball team that is largely black, and a Duke men's lacrosse team that is almost (save for one player) exclusively white. A white man insulted the Rutgers team with a mean-spirited quip. No season cancelled. No coach fired. No arrests. Nobody on the basketball team had to spend tens of thousands of dollars on defense attorneys. They were insulted. The were the targets of a stupid racially charged remark ... but that's pretty much it. But how about Duke? The Duke team members were accused of a crime. Attorneys were hired. Coaches fired. Seasons cancelled. Reputations damaged. DNA swabs were taken. Charges were filed. The district attorney was out there saying that a rape most definitely had occurred. Now we find that they were completely innocent. In the meantime the white man who made the stupid remark about the Rutgers basketball team is being attacked and vilified as if he was a mass murderer. The black woman who made the false charges of rape against the lacrosse team is going to walk. In fact, you can fully expect the civil rights establishment --- the same civil rights establishment that is united in their efforts to destroy Don Imus -- circle the wagons around Crystal Gail Mangum and protect her at all costs.

Oprah is going to have the Rutgers woman's basketball team on her show. How many of you would like to make book on when Oprah invites the Duke lacrosse team to be on her show? When pigs fly.

Back to talk radio.

The mainstream media in this country doesn't merely dislike talk radio, they hate it. Hate it with a blinding passion. How dare these "disc jockeys" get on those radio stations and spout opinions on matters of governance and public policy? Don't they know that this is a job to be left to the professionals at the New York Times and the Washington Post plus the major broadcast TV networks? What's worse, how dare the great unwashed of the general population get on these radio shows, especially the syndicated ones, and spout their ill-advised and uneducated opinions?

Think about this. You have a liberal columnist like Maureen Dowd or the insipid Tom Teepen write a column spouting some leftist dogma. That column gets published in newspapers across the country. Then you have some mechanic from Memphis get on the air with Limbaugh or Hannity to offer a differing point of view. The column may be read by a million people -- at the most. The Memphis mechanic is heard by perhaps five times that many. It just ain't right!

For years now the left has employed various tactics to marginalize talk radio. The favorite tactic is the tired "hate radio" accusation. The general idea here is that anything said on a talk radio show that is at variance with liberal dogma is "hate speech." This tactic hasn't worked ... and talk radio continues to grow.

Well .. now there's a new game plan. Use the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons of this world to attack these hosts on the basis of race. That's right .. this whole Imus affair isn't really about race! The TV networks and the liberal mainstream media haven't been hammering this Imus thing day after day after day because they really care about the racial aspects of the story. If they were that concerned about the racial angle they would be playing up the Duke case to a similar extent. Race is the means, not the reason. Right now the mainstream press sees race as the key to destroying talk radio. Focus on the hosts ... wait until they say something that can be racially exploited, and then launch the relentless attack. Go after networks, stations and advertisers. Concentrate on them -- one at a time -- like hyenas looking for a meal. Select prey that looks vulnerable. Isolate that prey and go in for the kill. I don't know how many hosts there are out there who have not made comments about black politicians, celebrities or culture that could be used as the basis for a full force attack. I know I have. Have I gone overboard? You bet! Hell .. 37 years in the business, how can you not have screwed up from time to time? I've apologized in the past -- and probably will one day say something else that merits an apology. Apologies aren't enough, however. The Christian concept of forgiveness and tolerance means nothing to the "reverends" Jackson and Sharpton. They're sharks .. and there's blood in the water.

By the way ... my guess? Now that MSNBC has dumped Imus, CBS is sure to follow. Look at it this way .... NBC has canned him. How in the hell can CBS stand up to the this racially charged onslaught? "Hey, CBS! NBC did the right thing? How about you?"

LOS ANGELES SUED OVER SANCTUARY POLICY

It's about time:

Illegal immigration opponents have sued the Los Angeles Police Department, taking aim at its long-standing policy of ignoring most suspects' immigration status.

The lawsuit filed Wednesday in Superior Court seeks to force officers to inform federal immigration officials when illegal immigrants are arrested on drug charges.

The department prohibits officers from inquiring about the immigration status of suspects, a policy strongly supported by Police Chief William Bratton and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

The lawsuit was brought on behalf of unidentified police officers who are afraid to speak out but argue the policy creates a situation where the same illegal immigrants are repeatedly arrested when they could have been deported, lawyer David Klehm said.

"Everyone I spoke to told me their hands were tied with this policy," Klehm said.

The lawsuit relies on a section of the state's Health and Safety Code that states that in drug cases involving a non-citizen, "the arresting agency shall notify the appropriate agency of the United States having charge of deportation."

Los Angeles police officers do not ask about immigration status while interviewing victims, witnesses and suspects, and do not arrest people based on immigration status.

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

INTEMPERATE THOUGHTS

Nancy Pelosi is not making noises about a trip to Iran. The appeasement duo of Pelosi and Lantos continue their usurpation of the presidential responsibility for foreign policy. Are the Democrats overplaying their hand? Is their hatred of George Bush such that they will try to supplant the presidency with the Speaker of the House and a radical leftist congressman from California? Sure looking that way.

One of the worse consequences of the absurd Imus controversy is that Al Sharpton has been further elevated as an apparent leader of Black America. He's a crass opportunist who's actions have led to the deaths of innocents. Don Imus has never said anything that lead to innocent people dying. Al Sharpton has. Now Sharpton is leading the media in a chant for the head of Imus.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution has upped the ante. Now they want the guy who was talking to Imus on the phone about the Rutgers basketball team fired. Hey ... here's a suggestion. How about firing the guy at the dump button too! He could have cut the comment off the air, but he didn't. An obvious racist and his livelihood should be taken away from him.

Madonna believes in man-made global warming. OK, now I'm convinced.

A government school in the Northeast banned the Easter Bunny from appearing at a craft fair held at the school over the weekend. The superintendent insisted that the bunny be named Peter Rabbit or it could not appear. Now we all know that "passing a law effecting an establishment of religion" means allowing the Easter Bunny to show up at a craft fair at a government-operated school on a weekend.

Some are now estimating that Iran may be just one year away from developing a nuclear weapon. That certainly gives us cause for concern, but nothing should be done until we've dealt with the Imus situation.

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

10 THINGS MORE NEWSWORTHY THAN DON IMUS

Via Lucianne: Border Patrol Agents Under Attack

Judge rejects Padilla torture argument

Iraqi police recruits killed by female jihadi who hid a bomb under her abaya. Plus: New dispatch from the ground in Baghdad at Iraq the Model.

Ohio soldier missing in Iraq for 3 years

Where in the world is Ali-Reza Asgari?

In defense of Spc. Mario Lozano of the 69th Infantry Regiment. Lozano speaks to the NYPost.

A challenge to Time magazine's report blaming a soldier's death on lack of Army training. And another. And another. And another.

Democrats fear Fox

A closer look at the Khomeini cheerleader in Texas

Al Qaeda initiation tests in Germany

A 'COMPREHENSIVE' SOLUTION TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

by


In summer 2005, Esmeralda Nava, was a 4-year-old whose parents were illegal immigrant day laborers who had been in the United States a short time. It is unclear what the status of Cornelio Rivera Zamites was in 2005. It is believed he was deported in 2003; however he was in the U.S. illegally in late spring 2005. Had our laws been enforced, neither Nava nor Zamites would have been in the U.S. and Nava would be alive today. The only good that came of this horrible rape and murder of a child was the immigrant community saw law enforcement pursue and apprehend the suspect with every resource they had. That year, of the 13 murders in our county --11 arrests were made and eight of those arrests were illegal immigrants.



“Comprehensive” -- as it relates to immigration reform -- is one of those words that creates an instant picture. It’s like affirmative action or liberal or conservative, the mere use of the phrase or word conjures up a complete image of the subject. “Comprehensive” has come to mean in the immigration debate a simultaneous change in policy including a guest-worker program and border security with many concessions being made with American taxpayer dollars to accommodate illegal immigrants in America. Any plan that has been put forward in Congress or discussed on the airwaves or in the diners and town halls of American cities dealing with rampant illegal immigration can be called comprehensive. But to define “comprehensive” -- as the lefties and open border advocates do -- that this term separates those who want only to close the border from those who want to deal with the other aspects of illegal immigration -- misleads willfully. Nevetheless, it is true that it must be borders first.

The average American that is looking at this problem has no faith that the federal government can do anything simultaneously or comprehensively, There is no model either in previous attempts to control immigration or any other federal program that would give the American people confidence that the implementation will go smoothly.

Immigration positions have less to do with party and more to do with where you live and to what degree you are dealing with illegal immigration. In addition, it’s not just a border state problem anymore. I recently appeared on CSPAN with a U.S. Chamber of Commerce panel on immigration reform and have received calls from all over the country. It’s not just a border state problem.

The discussion should not be about limiting immigration but managing it. This should occur in the context that it means something to be an American. American culture is unique and worth preserving. “American Exceptionalism” is why people continue to come here. Today, we allow legal immigration to this country totaling more than all other countries in the world combined. In addition, if visas were granted to every person that is currently applying for them around the world, we would take in over 40 million additional people this year. With all the talk about whether people like America or not, they still want what we have which is the opportunity to rise above your station with hard work. We cannot, however, have unbridled immigration and the control of immigration is one of the few things that are actually enumerated in the Constitution of the United States.

So what is the solution? Talk to the people who are on the front lines of this problem, local law enforcement, and they will tell you what will work. First, make English the official language of the U.S. and require that all citizens are proficient in English. Then, secure the borders by whatever means necessary. It is not just a fence or border patrol, it is many solutions -- it is comprehensive. We know just a presence on the border deters crossings. Even the Drug Enforcement Administration had to acknowledge that the presence of the Minutemen on the border deterred the transport of illegal drugs across the border in 2006. We are going to be in the deserts of the Middle East and Afghanistan for a long time, so let’s use our training wisely and train the military on the border and deter crossings except at legal ports of entry. A combination of methods could be used but the goal is to prevent crossings anywhere but at checkpoints.

Next, implement a guest-worker program that requires that illegal immigrants go back to their home country to get the proper paperwork. Streamline the process to 14 days or less. Drivers’ licenses must only be given to immigrants with verifiable, valid visas and those licenses must expire when the visa expires.

Serious penalties should be levied on employers who employ undocumented workers, including the construction and hospitality industry. Allow employers and state welfare workers to verify documentation through a database they can access with current immigrant and visa information. In the early part of the 1900s, one million immigrants were processed a year with hand written entries for each person. If we could do it by hand then, we can do it now.

Local law enforcement must be given more jurisdiction over illegal immigrants in their own communities. Illegal immigrants who commit crimes must be tried in American courts and, if convicted, serve their entire sentences in American prisons. This seems on the surface to be harsh, but there is know evidence that their home governments, particularly Mexico, will prosecute them, and deportation will result in an unstoppable revolving door of violent crime in America. This is especially true with gang activity. The growth of gangs, especially MS 13, cannot be allowed and must be crushed with the full force of American law enforcement. The gang mentality is the terrorist mentality and cannot be allowed to flourish.

Immigration policies should be enforced. We should support immigration, but it needs to be legal immigration. American taxpayers have been more than generous with their time talents and their hard earned dollars. There is no government without the taxpayers, and the taxpayers insist on a certain level of respect for America, for American culture, and for the laws that provide an unprecedented amount of freedom for American citizens. Citizenship matters and is a valuable asset. There is no culture in the world that will offer more opportunity to immigrants but they must enter and exit our country legally and respect our culture and laws while they are here.

Comprehensive immigration reform should not necessarily be a path to citizenship. If an immigrant wants to become a citizen, then they have to meet certain criteria. We have a rich tradition of opening our arms to the world but we must never forget or be sorry that it is a privilege to come and live and work in the U.S. It is worth having and it is worth defending and enforcement of laws is the basis of that and has to be.

If you care about this issue, join me and people all over the country at “Hold Their Feet To the Fire” in Washington, D.C. from April 22-25. Log onto www.fairus.org for complete details.

RUNNING SCARED FROM FOX NEWS

Barack Obama and now Hillary Clinton are backing out of the Congressional Black Caucus/Fox News presidential debate this fall. Apparently they're afraid of the evil Fox News. What's the matter? If you want to be president of the United States, you've got to be able to roll with the big boys. So why won't they do it? The answer is really simple: they won't get the easy questions from a Fox News-moderated debate that they'll get from a CNN-moderated one.

Forget about the BS that they only want to participate in DNC-sponsored political debates. This is all about running scared from Fox News. Obama, Edwards and Clinton are afraid of hard questions. They're afraid they might be called out on something. Hillary Clinton is afraid she'll be asked, for instance, why she voted for the war in Iraq but is now against it. She'll be asked why it's such a big deal that George W. Bush fired 8 U.S. Attorneys when her husband fired all 93. You know, things like that.

And note the double standard here. Had Republican candidates ducked a debate that involved the Congressional Black Caucus, you can bet they would all be branded racists and outrage would ensue, no matter who was sponsoring the debate. But Democratic candidates get a pass. Isn't that the way it always works?